A Comprehensive Comparison of Monero and Zcash Features

Comparison Comparison of the features of Monero and ZCASH

The world of cryptocurrencies has exploded in recent years, and many new players have entered the scene. Among these new arrivals are two popular cryptocurrencies that have drawn significant attention to their unique characteristics: Monero and Zcash. The two pieces offer different approaches to the security, confidentiality and decentralization of blockchain, making it attractive options for users looking for a safer and more private experience of digital currency.

MONERO (XMR)

Monero is a decentralized cryptocurrency of a currency developed in 2014 by Nicolas Van Saberhagen. It is designed to provide a sure way to transfer funds without discovering data on the third part transaction, which includes the IP addresses of its users. The main characteristics that Monero are distinguished include:

* Private transactions : Transactions carried out on the Monero network are pseudonyms and anonymous.

* Annular signatures : A unique feature that allows users to create private transactions (Ring) without discovering their public keys.

* Pseudonym Creation of a calculation advice : Users can generate a new unique portfolio address for each transaction, which prevents the connection of identity in the real world with its virtual tickets.

ZCASH (rabbit)

ZCASH is another cryptographic currency that came out of the ZCASH 2016 project. It was designed by Ross Wall and its team in consensys, in order to provide a quick, private and safe means of transferring blockchain funds. Key characteristics that ZCASH differences include:

* Evidence of zero knowledge : transactions carried out on the ZCASH network can be verified without detecting sensitive data.

* Pseudonym Creation of a portfolio address

: similar to Monero, users can generate new portfolio addresses for each transaction.

* Censorship resistant transactions : ZCASH Network allows users to carry out censorship transactions using a technique called “zero knowledge” to check the authenticity of transactions without detecting their content.

Comparison of key characteristics

| Characteristic | Monero (XMR) | ZCASH (rabbit) |

| — | — | — |

| Confidentiality of the transaction | Yes, annular signatures and the pesudimolation of the creation of a portfolio address | No, but with evidence of zero knowledge |

| Portfolio address generation | Unique public keys for each transaction | New unique wallets for each transaction |

| Verification of evidence of zero knowledge | No | Yes (transactions resistant to censorship) |

| Cenzure resistance | Limited (depending on the portfolio configuration) | Full resistance of censorship |

Comparison of safety measures

Monero and ZCASH use advanced safety measures to protect user’s means. However, they differ in their approach:

* Annular signatures : The two rooms use the signatures of the ring to create a private transaction recording.

* Pseudonimique Creation of a portfolio address : The two systems generate new unique wallets for each transaction.

However, the main difference lies in the way of evidence of zero knowledge and the resistance of censorship. The ZCASH evidence test system Zecash is more complex and require a more in -depth understanding of cryptographic concepts. Moner’s approach is simpler, but always offers effective protection of censorship.

Comparison of Scalabiness

Evolution is another key aspect to consider when choosing Monero and Zcash. The two parts aim to increase the processing time of transactions, and certain estimates suggest that they can manage approximately 1-2 transactions per second (TPS).

* Monero

: With total market capitalization of more than $ 100 million, Monero wishes to reach TP of 10,000 TP.

* ZCASH : With a market capitalization of less than $ 20 million, ZCASH still works to reach the same level of Scalabiness.

Decentralised Exchange Dash Token Sale